What's your point? If you find Committeeman Ferramosca's post to be informative isn't that a good thing?
It's been a few days since the meeting and it would seem that any new information that the committee has to share with the public on this matter is helpful.
The committee is supposed to work in a collaborative manner so what's wrong with Ferramosca's or any other member getting involved here?
For the record, the State requires each municipality to have a Environmental Commission - you can't dissolve it. I realize that you were just trying to use an example but having served on the Environmental Commission I thought the readers should know this.
Interestingly enough it does appear that your are more focus on finding fault with the process than perhaps the intended outcome of this proposal which could be a savings for the tax-payers.
While it's certainly your right to question the procedures and even the presentation to the public, in my view your post does not deal with the core issue which is whether or not it makes sense to go forward with the committees proposal.
This matter is being handled openly and by all accounts the committee has sought out suggestions and input from all of the interested parties.
