Mr. Sutcliffe, you certainly seem to be singing a different tune today, in response to Judy Iradi's post, than what you were singing just yesterday. Then--and I see that you have removed both my post that was critical of the manner in which the proposal for the reorganization/merger of the DPW and Parks and Recreation Departments was, er, "handled, as well as your "What's your point," response, you said, in part: While it's certainly your right to question the procedures and even the presentation to the public, in my view your post does not deal with the core issue which is whether or not it makes sense to go forward with the committees proposal. This matter is being handled openly and by all caccounts the committee has sought out suggestions and input from all of the interested parties
What brought about the almost 360 degree change?
Could it be that you are actually beginning to get my point after all? Joe P.
